This is a follow up to the post from last month where I asked you to define “success” as a pastor and leader.
Here are some of my thoughts:
We regularly hold this in tension, don’t we? The Scriptures in themselves don’t define success for pastors…very successfully. It shares to some extent what leaders ought to be doing and how but to my reading, it doesn’t elaborate on the metrics by which we “assess” ourselves and yet, we all live in a culture – including the church culture – where we have both codified and mostly un-codified metrics that determine what “successful” pastors look like.
And thus, we live in this constant tension. Having said that, I try to live out my faith and calling through these questions and categories:
- How is my relationship with the Triune God?
- How is my relationships with my wife and children? I can’t fake this. My relationship with my wife impacts so much.
- How is my relationship with my staff? I need to invest in my staff so that they in turn, can invest in others.
- How is my relationship with my church?
- How is my relationship with my neighbors and my larger city?
My three main responsibilities as a pastor:
- Teach well. Am I teaching and preaching Christ crucified? Am I preaching the whole Scripture and Gospel with clarity, conviction, and boldness? Am I directing people to the gospel?
- Lead well. Am I leading the church and our community towards our holistic vision of soul, community, justice and compassion, and global presence. Am I leading people to the gospel so that they are living out the gospel? Am I leading with transparency? Am I leading with the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
- Care well. Am I caring for people? People vs Programs. Am I praying for people? Am I caring for the sick? Am I accessible? Am I reaching out to people?
And on a regular basis, I also ask myself these three questions during my heart-check walks:
- Who are you?
- Who do you serve?
- Where are you going?
So, while I don’t use the word “success” to define myself, I assess how faithful I have been to the list above.
Thoughts? How do you gauge your “success” or “faithfulness?”
Sometime this month, I’ll share with you how I process the tension and possible idolatry of … numbers.
15 Replies to “defining success as a pastor and leader”
I agree that success can be such a elusive measure,so much of its premise is at war with the gospel story.
Seems like for pastors, its usually a group of people who come from places of success before they begin “professional ministry”. You have to have some level of charisma, popularity, admiration and successy stuff like that to try and lead a voluntary group where people give money and resources instead of profit.
So you have a successful person trying to lead and lead well a people that by definition are attempting to be those who give thier lives away for the sake of an often invisible God. Mind bender.
BTW, if you still need a tent, I got one for you
and thanks for the offer on the tent. i got one and it works out as they want it to be left in haiti to be used by those who need it.
I think the most successful pastor and leader is one where when someone is at the bottom of bottoms they know they can call that person and they will be there soon pointing to God.
If they can’t do this. What Gospel are they preaching?
One way to define success might be having the unusual ability to “borrow” tents and being part of a ministry that is sending tents to haiti at the same time.
Or maybe that’s the definition of persuasiveness.
Not sure where the icon for tongue-in-cheek is, but please insert here.
Not sure the definition of success, but the definition of persuasive is asking to “borrow” a tent the same week you are giving tents to Haiti.
(not sure where the tongue-and-cheek icon is, but insert here)
Yeah, but did you have to post that tongue and cheek comment twice?
It’s pretty cheeky of you.
sorry, thought I deleted the first one. feel free to chuck it.
The mission statement I have held for 17 years of pastoral ministry calls me:
To build …
• Vibrant faith in Christ,
• Joy-filled living, and
• Active influence
… into the people whose lives I am privileged to touch.
It gets specific in terms of relationships, as your does: to God, wife and children, friends, church, kingdom, and self.
I think what you have is excellent Eugene. I’m copying and keeping it on file. Thanks!
Great question to grapple with. I often tell people that a good leader is one who enables others to become all that God intends them to be. I think that our greatest satisfaction should be in seeing others succeed not in our own “success”
christine: absolutely agree.
I couldn’t agree more with this basic “definition” of successful leadership, Christine. It’s interesting to me that (in my experience) leaders who disagree with you are basically looking out for themselves and view the type of leaders who agree with you as weak. IMO, the leader in the former group are not leaders at all and generally “succeed” by controlling those around them and taking credit rather than giving credit where it’s due. They tend to be driven by the fear of losing their position of leadership. The leader in the latter group (those who agree with you) are not leaders by title, position or their own claim but because people love to be lead by them.
A successful pastor is able to bring people to Christ and deepen the strength of those who believe. The relationships and responsibilities you mentioned are all components to this, but if the pastor is unable to personally persuade and demonstrate his faith through his demeanor and the way he lives, none of them means anything.
There are pastors who chose this career for the wrong reasons (anything besides a burning desire to serve Christ is a wrong reason) and they’re left with no metrics except those that are quanitifiable, like membership or campus size.
Your personal impact on people – and you may not even know some of your successes – is what defines your effectiveness. It’s hard to quantify, but the people you minister to know when you’ve succeeded.