As you know, I joined Twitter (@eugenecho) about two months ago after asking you for Twitter advice. I’m convinced that it’s very useful – particularly because it is what you make of it. I do find it comical when the Twitter critics chat about how much they dislike Twitter – and yet, they’re updating their Facebook statuses every other hour. Huh?
But why do we tend to go overboard? For example, I was reading the article below from Time Magazine entitled, Twittering in Church, and while I fully embrace the changing mode of technology, communication, and language (and the church’s need to learn and engage in this language), I’m uncertain about the church encouraging people to twitter through the different elements of a church worship service: singing, sermons, communion, etc.
Maybe, I’m getting old fashioned. Heck, I joined Facebook after the majority of my church joined and finally caved in to Twiiter. But I’d like to hear your opinions:
- What do you think of encouraging people to twitter through a service?
- What are the boundaries? How far is too far?
I liken this to my post months ago about video venues coming near you. I support using technology, utilizing videos, and having them available as a resource but think we’re crossing unhealthy boundaries by replacing live and local pastors with somebody on a jumbo screen – even if they’re on high definition! Just because one can respond “we do it for the glory of Jesus” to everything seems dangerous to me.
Here’s the article from Time Magazine: Read the rest of this entry »
Filed under: christianity, church, culture, emerging church, religion, facebook, social media, time magazine, twitter














recent comments